The Box-assemblage and Luce Irigaray’s Écriture Feminine

Authors

  • Lawrence Buttigieg Artist | architect | freelance researcher

Abstract

DOI: 10.19251/sej/2018.8(4.1)

Abstract

Taking its cue from Luce Irigaray’s écriture feminine, and prompted by a desire to create an exclusive space where libidinal desires are freed from societal inhibitions, Idoia and myself, as model and artist re-spectively, set out to create a particular kind of artefact. This takes the form of a mixed-media, box-assemblage within which lies an indeterminate territory where the self encounters the other through an eq-uitable relationship, unhindered by male-dominated knowledge. With an iconography imbued with liturgi-cal as well as profane tropes, and drawing heavily on Irigaray’s notion of the ‘sensible transcendental,’this structure exploits that which lies beyond female corporeality [Irigaray, 1993, p. 115, 129]. Its aesthetics, while encouraging disengagement from preconceived dogmas and the dissolution of sexual difference, en-hances the experience of its deific symbolism. By correlating her body with the divine, the box-assemblage gives this woman a trans-corporeal identity.

Not unlike the enigmatic realm outlined in Iragaray’s La Mystérique, the box-assemblage provides an ideal platform where Idoia expresses her uniqueness, primarily through high-definition simulacra pro-duced from moulds taken directly off her skin; as for myself, my representation takes place primarily through the agency of her otherness [Irigaray, 1985, p. 191- 202].This kind of artefact grants us a space within which we not only re-assess concepts of alterity and selfhood, but challenge the dominant role of male subjectivity. Just as Irigaray’s prose disrupts Jacques Derrida’s phalloegocentrism, the box-assemblage dismisses the traditional status of woman-as-commodity.

Keywords: artist, écriture feminine, Irigaray, model, otherness, subjectivity, sensible transcendental

References

References

Barker Victoria. 2010. ‘God, women, other.’ In Feminist theology. 18: 309.

Clark Kenneth. 1984. The nude: a study in ideal form. Princeton: Princeton UP.

Clément Catherine. 1994. Syncope. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.

Irigaray Luce. 1993a. ‘Divine women.’ In Sexes and genealogies. Trans. Gill, Gillian C. New York: Columbia UP.

Irigaray Luce. 1993. An Ethics of Sexual Difference. Trans. Carolyn Burke and Gillian C. Gill. New York: Cornell UP.

Irigaray Luce. 2002. The way of love. Trans. Bostic, Heidi and Stephen Pluháĉek. London: Continuum.

Irigaray Luce. 1985. Speculum of the Other Woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C. New York: Cornell UP.

Irigaray Luce. 1985. This Sex which is Not One. Trans. Porter, Catherine. New York: Cornell UP,

Irigaray Luce and Burke, Carolyn. 1980. ‘When our lips speak together.’ In Signs, Vol. 6, No. 1, Women: Sex and Sexuality, Part. 2 (Autumn), 69-79.

Joy Morny. 2006. Divine love: Luce Irigaray, women, gender and religion. Manchester: Manchester U P.

Martin Alison. 2000. Luce Irigaray and the question of the divine. Leeds: Maney publishing.

Mazzoni Cristina. 1999. Angela of Foligno’s Memoriale. Cambridge: D S Brewer.

Whitford Margaret. 1991. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine. Oxon: Routledge.

Published

2019-03-22

Issue

Section

Articles