The Main Tendencies of Transformation of Educational Systems in the Context of Ideological Foundations of Global Social Development
Abstrakt
DOI: 10.19251/sej/2018.7(16)
The social changes that led to the transformation of the educational sphere are described in the article. The global social transformations and the educational and upbringing reform associated with them are intended to implement a certain homogenization of the systems of social education and management of education in the spirit of efforts to create a global cultural, economic, political, legal and socio-civil space are analyzed from the point of view of the methodology of education. The modernization of social, economic and political development and personality potential in the values and normative dimension of modern globalized societies of the world is explored. The modern conceptions of education and educational management are examined.The prospects of humanization of educational systems, management and upbringing are examined.
It is mentioned that among the prerequisites of the existence of a developed civil society a successful formation and functioning of educational systems is necessary. The main task of modern education is the formation of literacy in the youth in according to the future (futures literacy) is described.
Key words: education, upbringing, transformation, educational systems, values, principles, educational management.
Bibliografia
References:
Batista S. 2014. “The Redistribution of Responsibilities in Five European Educational Systems: From Global Trends to National Arrangements”. European Educational Research Journal, nr. 13(2).
Budnyk O. 2016. “Educational Model of a Modern Student: European Scope”. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, nr. 3 (2-3).
Durkheim E. 1961. Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education. Trans. by E.K. Wilson and H. Schurer. Edited, with an introduction by E.K. Wilson. New York: Free Press.
Durkheim E. 1992. The Evolution of Educational Thought in France. Trans. by P.Collins. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Edwards, R. 2001. Meeting individual learner needs: power, subject, subjection. In Knowledge, Power and Learning, eds. C. Paechter, M. Preedy, D. Scott, and J. Soler. London: SAGE.
European Commission. ECTS Users’ Guide. 2015. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Flitner W. 2013. Sistematische Pedagogik. Breslau: Lehrfreiheit.
Gershunsky B.S. 1998. Philosophy of education. Moskva.: Flint.. (in Russian)
Joyner B.D. 2016. How to Effectively Teach Millennials: Understanding Intergenerational Factors. Publisher: Springer, Cham.
Kellner D. 2013. Technological Revolution, Multiple Literacies, and the Restructuring of Education. In Silicon Literacies, ed..Ilana Snyder. London and New York: Routledge.
Kondur O. 2017. “Global processes and integration of Pedagogics and Management in the education of Ukraine in the context of the European scientific and educational system”. Bulletin of Oleksandr Dovzhenko Hlukhiv National Pedagogical University, nr. 3(35). (in Ukrainian)
Kupavtsev A.V. 2017. “The Concept of a modern educational paradigm”. Alma Mater, nr. 6.
Rashkevich Yu.M. 2014. The Bologna process and a new paradigm of higher education. Lviv: Publishing House of Lviv Polytechnic.
Roberts D.H., Newman L.R., Schwartzstein R.M. 2012. „Twelve tips for facilitating Millennials’ learning”. Medical theacher.
Shchedrovetskiy P.G. 2004. Pedagogy of freedom. Moskva: Architecture S. (in Russian)
Truzzi M. 2014. Liliputians in Gullivers Land: The social role of the Dwarf. Sociology and everyday life. N.J.: Englewood Cliffs.
Turner S. P. 1998. Kohlberg’s critique of Durkheim’s Moral Education. In Durkheim and Modern Education Routledge International Studies in the Philosophy of Education, eds. G. Walford, W.S.F. Pickering. London and New York: Routledge.
Turnure J., Buim N., Thurlow M. 2006. “The Effectiveness of Interrogatives for Prompting Verbal Laboration Productivity in Young Children”. Child Development, nr. 47.
Walford G. 1998. Durkheim, democracy and diversity: some thoughts on recent changes in England and Wales. In Durkheim and Modern Education. Routledge International Studies in the Philosophy of Education , eds. G. Walford and W.S.F. Pickering. London and New York: Routledge.
Weizsaecker E., Wijkman A. 2018. Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. Springer.
[www 1] Mykhailyshyn G., Kondur O., Chervinska I. 2017. “The monitoring of the university quality education in the context of globalization challenges of the present time”. 6th International Scientific Conference on Idealized Design: Redesigning Higher Education. Kraków − San Juan. January 21-22, 2017. http://jacko.econ. uj.edu.pl/Konf/Idealized Design/6/.(accessed: 01.02.2017).
[www 2] Act dated June 25, 2013, nr.344/2013. A National strategy for the devel¬opment of education in Ukraine until 2021. http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/344/2013. (accessed: 26.01.2018).
[www 3] Tovkach Ye.A. “The system of higher education in South Korea (second half of the twentieth century): formation, peculiarities of development, modern state”: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/7424/Tovkach_syste¬ma_vyshchoyi_ osvity.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed: 18.01.2018). (in Ukrainian)
[www 4] Wawak Tadeusz. “Znaczenie reformy szkolnictwa wyższego w procesie re¬strukturyzacji przedsiębiorstw”. https://tadeusz.wawak.pl/content/znaczenie-reformy-zkolnictwa-wyzszego-w-procesie-restrukturyzacji-przedsiebiorstw. (accessed:28.01.2018).
Zinchenko V.V. 2016. The Education in techno-structures of Society. Studies in Philos¬ophy and Education. Volume “The Culture and Power of Knowledge: Inquiries into Contemporary Societies”.
Oksana Kondur, Deputy Dean of the Pedagogical Faculty,Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences, associate professor, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ukraine
